Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Future versions of psqlODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C96DA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Future versions of psqlODBC ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Future versions of psqlODBC
Re: Future versions of psqlODBC |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle > Sent: 22 March 2006 11:58 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Ludek Finstrle; > anoopk@pervasive-postgres.com; Hiroshi Inoue; Hiroshi Saito > Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future versions of psqlODBC > > > I therefore propose the following: > > > > 1) The current CVS code is branched into a > REL-08_01_PATCHES branch to > > be used for bug fixes. > > Sure. > > > 2) The REL-07_03_ENHANCED branch is merged into CVS tip, whilst > > maintaing the current installer and documentation etc. > > Sure. > > > 3) The driver is rebranded to > > PostgreSQL+/psqlodbcplus.so/psqlodbcplus.lib to > differentiate it from > > all previous versions. > > I disagree. If I remember it right there was psqlodbcplus already. > Why confuse users more? Why we need the differentiation? The driver > is based on 7.3 version ... Well, either way it will be different from 08.01 because there is only one driver in the 7.3E branch, so there is no ANSI/Unicode distinction. As for the name, yes, there was a psqlodbcplus, but I thought they never actually released anything. On double checking that's not the case so that isn't such a good name as you say. We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: