Re: human validation on post comments
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: human validation on post comments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9692@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | human validation on post comments (Travis Hein <travis.hein@travnet.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: human validation on post comments
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Fetter [mailto:david@fetter.org] > Sent: 21 March 2006 16:45 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL WWW > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] human validation on post comments > > The porn thing works just fine no matter what the timeout is, as the > spam is queued up already and the capcha gets presented as soon as > it's generated. The porn surfer will generally not dally when > presented with the capcha. Generating enough real traffic to a dummy site to ensure that there is always user ready to read a single capcha within a few minutes of it being generated just to post a single piece of spam seems like a pretty mean feat. I would think they could generate more revenue from bunging a few ads on the site than hoping that the spam they manage to get on a completely unrelated site might actually generate a customer. Still, I'm only speculating so may be completely wrong. > But apart from its ineffectiveness on spammers, as others have > mentioned, capcha excludes blind people. :( Yes - it's a shame none of us thought about it when Gevik was originally working on it. There is the audio option I suggested which Paypal use IIRC - alternatively we could use some sort of puzzle - such as 'enter the third, second from last and 2nd character from this string'. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: