Re: Using regexp_matches in the WHERE clause
От | David Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using regexp_matches in the WHERE clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E72D307E-D276-4FF6-8E05-8434C6370AB8@yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Using regexp_matches in the WHERE clause (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using regexp_matches in the WHERE clause
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Nov 26, 2012, at 7:13, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote: > > So I tried: > > SELECT * > FROM some_table > WHERE regexp_matches(somecol, 'foobar') is not null; > > However that resulted in: ERROR: argument of WHERE must not return a set > > Hmm, even though an array is not a set I can partly see what the problem is > (although given the really cool array implementation in PostgreSQL I was a bit surprised). > regex_matches returns a set because you can supply the "g" option to capture all matches and each separate match returnsits own record. Even though only one record is ever returned without the "g" option the function itself is the sameand still is defined to return a set. David J.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: