Re: Index only select count(*)
От | Toni Helenius |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index only select count(*) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E6A9CAA76548CB4EB02D2E3B174DD3B1EF9E189428@ink.sad.syncrontech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index only select count(*) (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index only select count(*)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, yes, I'm cheating by using GUI :) (PgAdmin) Here: "Aggregate (cost=18240.50..18240.51 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=2911.117..2911.119 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on min1_009 (cost=0.00..18108.60 rows=52760 width=0) (actual time=5.390..2816.274 rows=52760 loops=1)" "Total runtime: 2912.211 ms" -----Original Message----- From: Alban Hertroys [mailto:haramrae@gmail.com] Sent: 7. lokakuuta 2013 12:31 To: Toni Helenius Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Index only select count(*) On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:23, Toni Helenius <Toni.Helenius@syncrontech.com> wrote: > The output of analyze: > "Aggregate (cost=18240.50..18240.51 rows=1 width=0)" > " -> Seq Scan on min1_009 (cost=0.00..18108.60 rows=52760 width=0)" That's the output of Explain, not of Explain Analyze. The latter has actual measurements to go with the estimated costs,which gives a lot more insight. Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: