Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
От | Ogden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E6229A9F-876F-4604-900A-EC93C5B720AB@darkstatic.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ ("ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:31 PM, ktm@rice.edu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:26:56PM -0500, Ogden wrote: >> I am using bonnie++ to benchmark our current Postgres system (on RAID 5) with the new one we have, which I have configuredwith RAID 10. The drives are the same (SAS 15K). I tried the new system with ext3 and then XFS but the resultsseem really outrageous as compared to the current system, or am I reading things wrong? >> >> The benchmark results are here: >> >> http://malekkoheavyindustry.com/benchmark.html >> >> >> Thank you >> >> Ogden > > That looks pretty normal to me. > > Ken But such a jump from the current db01 system to this? Over 20 times difference from the current system to the new one withXFS. Is that much of a jump normal? Ogden
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: