Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems wrong)
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems wrong) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E5E78764-4968-4701-B458-45C0DDD3304C@myrealbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems wrong) (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 7, 2005, at 17:24 , Michael Paesold wrote: > Using both PostgreSQL 8.1.0 and CVS current of Nov 7, 9:00 am CET I > get a regression failure in the interval tests. I am no export for > the interval type, but the expected "9 days 28 hours" seem wrong, > don't they? The actual value seems to be the same. > > Is it possible that this is broken on the platform where the > expected results were generated? What platform are you testing on? With or without integer-datetimes? I just ran make check on for PostgreSQL 8.1.0 on Mac OS X 10.4.3 test=# select version(); version ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 8.1.0 on powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0, compiled by GCC powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5026) I didn't have any regression failures. I'd also expect we'd see a lot more failures on the build farm if it were the case that it was broken just on the platform that the expected results were generated on. From a quick look at the current build farm failures on HEAD and REL8_1_STABLE, it doesn't look like any of the failures are failing here. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: