Re: forced sequential scan when condition has current_user
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: forced sequential scan when condition has current_user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E56D1346-6E42-40D5-9CF1-239F5104F3A5@engineyard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: forced sequential scan when condition has current_user (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: forced sequential scan when condition has current_user
Re: forced sequential scan when condition has current_user |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Jan 4, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > The thing is, PostgreSQL doesn't know at planning time what the value of > current_user() will be, so the plan can't depend on that; the planner > just takes its best shot. current_user() is a stable function and the manual is explicit that the result of stable function can be used in an indexscan: "A STABLE function cannot modify the database and is guaranteed to return the same results given the same arguments for allrows within a single statement. This category allows the optimizer to optimize multiple calls of the function to a singlecall. In particular, it is safe to use an expression containing such a function in an index scan condition. (Sincean index scan will evaluate the comparison value only once, not once at each row, it is not valid to use a VOLATILEfunction in an index scan condition.)" postgres=# select provolatile from pg_proc where proname = 'current_user'; provolatile ------------- s So, I think the OP's question is still valid. Erik Jones, Database Administrator Engine Yard Support, Scalability, Reliability 866.518.9273 x 260 Location: US/Pacific IRC: mage2k
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: