Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is notsupported'
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is notsupported' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E3D77610-4272-4EAF-8776-E3A8733B9062@khalda-eg.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rockwell FactoryTalk Says 'SQL_TIMESTAMP data type is not supported' ("Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue@dream.email.ne.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Hiroshi, I’ll try anything! Would be great to use PostgreSQL with an industrial software like Rockwell. Thanks :) Regards, Michael Riksman Sent from iPhone On 23 Jul 2019, at 1:14 am, Inoue, Hiroshi <h-inoue@dream.email.ne.jp> wrote: Hi Michael, Could you try the test driver if I provide a Windows test driver? regards, Hiroshi Inoue On 2019/07/18 18:18, michael.riksman@khalda-eg.com<mailto:michael.riksman@khalda-eg.com> wrote: Hi, · your ODBC driver version psqlODBC is v11.01.000. SQL_DRIVER_ODBC_VER reports “3.51” [6608-0.002] info.c[PGAPI_GetInfo]71: entering...fInfoType=77 [6608-0.002] info.c[PGAPI_GetInfo]1032: p='03.51', len=0, value=0, cbMax=12 · your PostgreSQL database version v10.9 x86 Running on Windows 10 32-bit · any error messages you saw on the screen The client application (Rockwell FactoryTalk), has a button which can automatically create the tables in an existing database. It created a table successfully that DID NOT have a TIMESTAMP column. But I had to manually create two tables that had aTIMESTAMP column. When I clicked ‘OK’ to accept the changes, I get this error; <image001.png> FactoryTalk works fine with Microsoft SQL ODBC. · the debug log (mylog_????.log) file (you will have to enable the mylog driver option) Attached. I ran the ODBC Test tool, and connected via ODBC version 2 (as this is what FactoryTalk appears to be using) [2892-0.001]odbcapi30.[SQLSetEnvAttr]477: Entering att=200,2 I then ran a GetTypeInfo on SQL_TIMESTAMP(11), and it returns SQL_SUCCESS <image002.png> But in the logs, it shows this; [6608-1677.216]odbcapiw.c[SQLGetTypeInfoW]1015: Entering [6608-1677.216] info.c[PGAPI_GetTypeInfo]1115: entering...fSqlType=93 [6608-1677.216]statement.[SC_recycle_statement]812: entering self=0052D2E0 [6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Constructor]173: entering [6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Constructor]242: leaving [6608-1677.216]statement.[SC_set_Result]531: (0052D2E0, 00539F48) [6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_Destructor]344: entering [6608-1677.216] bind.c[extend_column_bindings]718: entering ... self=0052D370, bindings_allocated=0, num_columns=19 [6608-1677.216] bind.c[extend_column_bindings]762: leaving 004F8C30 [6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_set_num_fields]40: entering [6608-1677.216] qresult.c[QR_set_num_fields]44: leaving It appears the fSQLType changed from SQL_TIMESTAMP(11) to SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP(93)…? Could this be what is causing the issue? Regards, Michael Riksman Instrument and Control Specialist Khalda Petroleum Co. A KPC/Apache Corp. Joint Venture Salam Base, Egypt Mob: +20 122 0530603 Email: michael.riksman@khalda-eg.com<mailto:michael.riksman@khalda-eg.com> [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> ウイルスフリー。 www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: