BUG #6517: Volatile function erroneously optimized, does not consider change in schema path
От | rene.vanpaassen@gmail.com |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #6517: Volatile function erroneously optimized, does not consider change in schema path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1S4WSm-0000yu-Mr@wrigleys.postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6517: Volatile function erroneously optimized, does
not consider change in schema path
Re: BUG #6517: Volatile function erroneously optimized, does not consider change in schema path |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6517 Logged by: Rene van Paassen Email address: rene.vanpaassen@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2 Operating system: Fedora 16=20 Description:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 I found some unexpected behaviour when changing the schema search path in combination with plpgsql functions (may be true for other function types too, did not check). This occurs both in 9.1.2 (on Fedora, 64 bit) and 8.4.9 (Centos 6, 32 bit). I created a small example run with psql, to demonstrate this. -- play with two schemas create schema s1; create schema s2; -- create a table in s1 and add some values set search_path to s1; create table users ( u INT ); INSERT INTO users VALUES(1); INSERT INTO users VALUES(2); -- same for second schema set search_path to s2; create table users ( u INT ); INSERT INTO users VALUES(3); -- directly evaluating the query is OK set search_path to s1; select count(*) from users; set search_path to s2; select count(*) from users; -- now with a function create language 'plpgsql'; -- only for 8.4.9 set search_path to public; CREATE FUNCTION countusers() RETURNS INT AS $PROC$ BEGIN RETURN count(*) FROM users; END $PROC$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE; -- first run it with the users table in s1 set search_path to public,s1; select countusers(); -- now it should run with the users table in s2,=20 -- but it actually runs with the table in s1 again set search_path to public,s2; select countusers(); Is this behaviour as it should be? It seems like the second query is optimized away, despite the VOLATILE keyword on the function I also saw bug report=20 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-05/msg00999.php which seems to be a more specific version of this same problem.=20 Greetings,=20 Ren=C3=A9 p.s. Thanks for a wonderful database program. I fixed the problem for now in my python web app by closing and opening the database before each change in schema search path.=20
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: