Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT
От | Alex Goncharov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1OGsQ2-000FHM-FG@daland.home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT (Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT
Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
,--- I/Alex (Mon, 24 May 2010 12:25:18 -0400) ----* | No equivalent of FETCH_COUNT is available at the libpq level, so I | assume that the interface I am using is smart enough not to send | gigabytes of data to FE. | | Where does the result set (GBs of data) reside after I call | PQexecPrepared? On BE, I hope? Sorry for asking again... No sarcasm meant: is there no straightforward answer here? Or nobody is certain? Or a wrong list? Thanks, -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: