Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1LLd8p-0008W1-Ox@elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks (Stefano Nichele <stefano.nichele@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
At 03:28 PM 1/8/2009, Merlin Moncure wrote: >On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Stefano Nichele ><stefano.nichele@gmail.com> wrote: > > Merlin Moncure wrote: > >> IIRC that's the 'perc 6ir' card...no write caching. You are getting > >> killed with syncs. If you can restart the database, you can test with > >> fsync=off comparing load to confirm this. (another way is to compare > >> select only vs regular transactions on pgbench). > > > > I'll try next Saturday. > > > >just be aware of the danger . hard reset (power off) class of failure >when fsync = off means you are loading from backups. > >merlin That's what redundant power conditioning UPS's are supposed to help prevent ;-) Merlin is of course absolutely correct that you are taking a bigger risk if you turn fsync off. I would not recommend fysnc = off if you do not have other safety measures in place to protect against data loss because of a power event.. (At least for most DB applications.) ...and of course, those lucky few with bigger budgets can use SSD's and not care what fsync is set to. Ron
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: