Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1EDZQs-0005xp-3c@lerami.lerctr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I have a 3.4.3 RT using PG quite happily. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Roderick A. Anderson Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:51 PM To: Pg Advocacy Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL I've been away from the site and mailing list for better than a year so was surprised as all get out that MySQL is ther recommended database for RT. The version I installed over four years ago uses Pg. My question is does anyone know why they decided to go with MySQL? ( Pg 7.3 or above is an alternative; as is Oracle ). I would ask the RT list but don't want to get into any flaming combats and was hoping someone here might know ( having risked being charred. ) Thanks, Rod -- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: