Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity?
От | James Tomson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1D013D1-ED51-4978-A5B0-586DF1A801A2@pushd.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks all - we did have our max_connections set very very high (100k) as we upgraded this db in a load test environment,and did not want to reboot the db after hitting the lower, saner, production limits during load testing. I am surprised this allocation was taking place for unused connections - I’ve also verified that lowering max_connectionsto 10K on this instance fixed the issue for us. Much appreciated! Best, James > On May 7, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Hmm, but 102400 is only 100kB, nowhere near the 1GB-1 limit, so there's >> something odd going on there. > > I can reproduce the described behavior by also setting max_connections > to something around 16K. > > Now, it seems pretty silly to me to be burning in excess of 1GB of shmem > just for the current-query strings, and then that much again in every > backend that reads pg_stat_activity. But should we be telling people they > can't do it? I'm working on a patch to use MemoryContextAllocHuge for > the "localactivity" buffer in pgstat_read_current_status. It might seem > dumb now, but perhaps in ten years it'll be common. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: