Re: Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer)
От | Johann Zuschlag |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E15a23F-0008D6-00@mrelay01.kundenserver.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer) (Mike Finn <mike.finn@tacticalExecutive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Mike On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:08:39 -0600, Mike Finn wrote: >Your routine is not working becase you have no body in your function. Well done! It now works. I didn't need to drop the operator, since there was nothing to drop. :-) > >The HACK below does work. I say HACK because >a) this routine should really should be in C > as it will executed billions of times when > used in where clauses (but I am not a "C" programmer) It's not a hack and it works fine with more than 10.000 datasets. But maybe C would be faster. >b) I don't really understand the effects/implications > of the commutator, negator, restrict, and join parameters > (I simply copied them from your example, and the docs > were a bit beyond me) > Just read the manual. The above is explained in detail. >Maybe someone listening with a bit more pg savvy can help us out further. Maybe :-) regards Johann Johann Zuschlag zuschlag@online.de
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: