Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL
От | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57902A84A4B@m0143.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL
Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Yeah, I think it would be useful to log one message if after (say) 5 > > seconds we still haven't been able to open the file. > > Either that, or on the first run. Imho 1-5s is better, so that would be after the 10-50th try. > loop. It's supposed to loop 300 times. Yes. > > (Are we OK with the idea of sleeping 1 second each time?) > > I think not. 0.1 seconds is better. We don't want to delay a full second if > it's just a transient thing. Yes 0.1 s is imho good. Btw. m$ is talking about milliseconds (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316609) Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: