Re: Patch queue concern
От | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch queue concern |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901E7B0AE@m0143.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch queue concern (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > My feeling is we should have more regular sync points where the patch > > queue is emptied and everything committed or rejected. > > No doubt, but the real problem here is that > reviewing/committing other people's patches is not fun, it's > just work :-(. So it's no surprise that it tends to get put > off. Not sure what to do about that. In my experience it mostly pays to keep people directly responsible for their own work. Every intermediate tester/reviewer/coordinator tends to reduce the submitter's feeling for responsibility. So I could imagine a modus operandi where a submitter states: I feel confident that you can commit without review and will be availabe for fixes/additional work required. Maybe we have that in the form of committers that commit their own work already. But I do feel that some patches Bruce is talking about need aggreement and help, not only review. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: