Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads
От | eem21@cam.ac.uk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E11C3is-0005PL-00@red.csi.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Threads (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 Aug, Tom Lane wrote: > [ Snip discussion regarding PQconnectdb()s thread-safety ] > > If you want to work on it, be my guest... I don't have time to think about this today, so I can't comment on how it should work, but I _am_ currently working in this area - I am providing non-blocking versions of the connect statements, as discussed on the interfaces list a couple of weeks ago. In fact, it is pretty much done, apart from a tidy-up, documentation, and testing. I don't see any point in two people hammering away at the same code - it will only make work when we try to merge again - so perhaps I should implement what ever is decided - I don't mind doing so. However, if I didn't get it done this weekend it would have to be mid-to-late September, since I'm going away. Would that be a problem for anyone? I had noticed that the connect statements weren't thread-safe, but was neither aware that that was a problem for anyone, nor inclined to audit the whole of libpq for thread-safety, so I left it alone. Ewan.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: