Re: Languages and Functions
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Languages and Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E09D018F-D0F2-4729-A087-0778382F818F@seespotcode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Languages and Functions ("Robert James" <srobertjames@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Languages and Functions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On May 29, 2007, at 9:49 , Robert James wrote: > 1. How can I get a list of available functions (ie, user defined or > contrib) using SQL? You can take a look in the pg_proc table, which is part of the system catalog, to see which functions are installed. file:///usr/local/pgsql/pgsql-8.2.0/doc/html/catalog-pg-proc.html You might try something like SELECT proname , pronargs , lanname FROM pg_proc NATURAL JOIN ( SELECT oid as prolang, lanname FROM pg_language) AS lang ORDER BY proname, pronargs, lanname; proname | pronargs | lanname ------------------------------------+----------+---------- RI_FKey_cascade_del | 0 | internal RI_FKey_cascade_upd | 0 | internal RI_FKey_check_ins | 0 | internal RI_FKey_check_upd | 0 | internal ... > 2. Is there any performance or other advantage to using PL/pgsql > over Pl/Perl or Python? It depends on what your function is doing. If you're doing simple SQL- type things, PL/pgsql might be a good fit. If you're doing more advanced text processing or calling external libraries, PL/Perl could be better. I don't have any experience with Python. As with all things, test and benchmark to for your particular case for the best results :) Hope this helps. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: