Re: The old pl/pgsql editor question back again
От | Garcia, Joshua |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The old pl/pgsql editor question back again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E00A3B716AD4C84FB97E42367015E8A00BFF36@usa5911mf01.na.xerox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The old pl/pgsql editor question back again (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The old pl/pgsql editor question back again
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
I just tried out your editor and it looks pretty good. There are two features I would deem absolutely necessary that no single editor I have used seems to have. These are: - syntax highlighting that is smart enough to look akward when a syntax error is made. I think nedit does a pretty good job of this. emacs syntax highlighting I've tried is pretty weak, but I really like emacs and use it a lot. - smart indention like emacs has in its c-mode. I've seen editors have no automatic/smart indention or the indention just doesn't work properly for pl/pgsql Josh -----Original Message----- From: John DeSoi [mailto:desoi@pgedit.com] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:30 AM To: Garcia, Joshua Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] The old pl/pgsql editor question back again On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Garcia, Joshua wrote: > Have better editors popped up for pl/pgsql since the last > discussion about pl/pgsql editors in the mailing lists? Or have > the features for the most popular pl/pgsql editors improved since > the last discussion? What features are you looking for that existing products don't have? John DeSoi, Ph.D. http://pgedit.com/ Power Tools for PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: