RE: citext, actually probably using extensions
От | Kevin Brannen |
---|---|
Тема | RE: citext, actually probably using extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DM6PR19MB34512C8282CD3F9ABDF14D63A4850@DM6PR19MB3451.namprd19.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: citext, actually probably using extensions (Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> From: Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>
>
> Not sure about best practices, but what I'm going is like this:
>
> * Create a schema named extensions.
> * Install extensions in this special schema only. I don't put anything else in there.
> * Put the extensions schema early (left) in the search_path for each role.
> * Grant execute access permissively on the functions in that schema.
>
> If there's something deeply flawed about this strategy, I'd be keen to hear about it. On the positive side, I find it simple to understand, maintain, and explain to other people. YMMV
>
We do approximately the same thing if it makes you feel better, although we call our schema "common".
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: