foreign key referencing inheritance parent
От | J Lumby |
---|---|
Тема | foreign key referencing inheritance parent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DM6PR06MB5562927953A8FAA81FE792B1A37B0@DM6PR06MB5562.namprd06.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-sql |
This has come up before elsewhere e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26034752/postgresql-inheritance-and-foreign-key-referencing-parent-table but I don't see any mention in any pg mailing list. postgresql permits creation of a foreign key referencing a table which is the parent of child tables via inheritance but enforces that every foreign key value must exist as pkey ONLY in the parent - it throws an ERROR otherwise, even if the pkey exists in a child table. This is problematic (to me) for three slightly different reasons : 1) it is surprising. The expectation is that a reference to accessing row(s) in a parent table will also search all children, as with SELECT, unless the ONLY keyword is specified. which then leads to ... 2) it is inconsistent with, and less useful than, the somewhat similar CHECK clause in a CREATE/ALTER TABLE : _____________________________________________________ CHECK ( expression ) [ NO INHERIT ] A constraint marked with NO INHERIT will not propagate to child tables. _____________________________________________________ For CHECK, the default is propagation to child tables unless explicitly prevented, which is consistent with SELECT and the ONLY qualifier. For FOREIGN KEY there is no optional qualifier to express "propagation" (i.e. propagation of the search for primary key) or "ONLY" and the behaviour is always "ONLY". 3) I am probably wrong but as far as I can tell this behaviour is not documented anywhere. Would there be any interest in providing a choice, e.g. an optional [ INHERIT ] on the REFERENCES clause, in a future release? Cheers, John
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: