Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
От | Rakesh Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DM2PR05MB6228322B1A4220BDF495E0D8CC10@DM2PR05MB622.namprd05.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
|
Список | pgsql-general |
________________________________________ From: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 17:25 To: Rakesh Kumar Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multi tenancy : schema vs databases On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com<mailto:rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>> wrote: Hi I would like to know which technique is better for supporting multi-tenancy= applications, going upto hundreds or even thousands of tenants. 1 - One database with difference schemas (one schema per tenant) or 2 - One database per tenant. Did you mean one database with-in a postgresql cluster ? Yes. Say something like this within a PG cluster db4978 db6234 ... 100s of such databases.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: