Re: [HACKERS] Making server name part of the startup message
От | Satyanarayana Narlapuram |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Making server name part of the startup message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DM2PR03MB4167FF1487DC9A970A175B491C70@DM2PR03MB416.namprd03.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Making server name part of the startup message (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: Andres Freund [mailto:andres@anarazel.de] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 10:48 AM To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana.Narlapuram@microsoft.com>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Making server name part of the startup message On 2017-06-15 09:43:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Satyanarayana Narlapuram <Satyanarayana.Narlapuram@microsoft.com> writes: > > As a cloud service, Azure Database for PostgreSQL uses a gateway proxy to route connections to a node hosting the actualserver. To do that, the proxy needs to know the name of the server it tries to locate. As a work-around we currentlyoverload the username parameter to pass in the server name using username@servername convention. It is purely aconvention that our customers need to follow and understand. We would like to extend the PgSQL connection protocol to addan optional parameter for the server name to help with this scenario. > > We don't actually have any concept of a server name at the moment, and > it isn't very clear what introducing that concept would buy. > Please explain. cluster_name could be what's meant? Andres, thank you! It is database cluster name as you mentioned. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: