Re: Pre-allocating WAL files
От | Bossart, Nathan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pre-allocating WAL files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DF1A2298-6367-4B6E-A0BE-00E7B09489D4@amazon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pre-allocating WAL files (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pre-allocating WAL files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/30/21, 3:52 AM, "Maxim Orlov" <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote: > I did check the patch too and found it to be ok. Check and check-world are passed. > Overall idea seems to be good in my opinion, but I'm not sure where is the optimal place to put the pre-allocation. > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 2:46 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've checked the patch v7. It applies cleanly, code is good, check-world tests passed without problems. >> I think it's ok to use checkpointer for this and the overall patch can be committed. But the seen performance gain makesme think again before adding this feature. I did tests myself a couple of months ago and got similar results. >> Really don't know whether is it worth the effort. Thank you both for your review. Nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: