Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
От | Michael Brusser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DEEIJKLFNJGBEMBLBAHCKEJLDMAA.michael@synchronicity.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well. Mike. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] ... ... > Michael Brusser <michael@synchronicity.com> writes: > > 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks: > > Interrupted system call > > Hmm. I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my local man > pages for read() and write() say they can return EINTR if interrupted > by a signal. This may depend on the filesystem in use (are you using > NFS?) > > We had probably better fix fd.c to retry on EINTR. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: