Re: Do we always need the socket file?
От | Michael Brusser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we always need the socket file? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DEEIJKLFNJGBEMBLBAHCKEHHCNAA.michael@synchronicity.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we always need the socket file? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we always need the socket file?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
We're trying to avoid creating any unnecessary files, especially outside of the product installation tree. Look at this as a policy. Experience shows that sooner or later some of your customers ask you: what is this /tmp/.s.PGSQL.xxx file is? What do I need it for? Also some admins known to periodically clean out /tmp, /var/run, etc. Mike. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:38 PM > To: michael@synchronicity.com > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Do we always need the socket file? > > > Michael Brusser wrote: > > I have Postgres 7.2.1 configured to listen on TCP/IP port. > > When the server starts up it still creates the socket file in /tmp. > > Removing this file manually does not seem to cause any problem for the > > application. > > > > Is there a way to prevent postmaster from creating this file? > > Is this really safe to remove the socket file, or would it create > > some problem that I won't necessarily see? > > I guess the big question is why you don't want the file created? If you > have 'local' disabled in pg_hba.conf, it doesn't allow connections. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, > Pennsylvania 19073 >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: