Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
| От | Decibel! |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | DD52A3AC-9ED8-47F4-89D8-9D70A8B2DB87@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > * has no set operations (UNION etc), grouping, set-returning functions > in the SELECT list, LIMIT, or a few other funny cases Couldn't union/union all be treated as EXISTS(a) OR EXISTS(b) ... Or am I missing some detail with NULLS? Personally, I'd rather write it as separate EXISTS clauses rather than using UNION, but perhaps others have a different preference... -- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: