Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Sunday, November 19, 2006 21:53:31 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> The thing is, 'checking for spam as it comes in' doesn't get rid of,
>> or reduce, the problem ... SPF might not be it either ... but, if (in
>> a perfect world) every mail server forced something like SPF, so that
>> ppl could only send email through a legit mail server (ie.
>> commandprompt.com email through a commandprompt.com mail server,
>> gmx.net mail through a gmx.net mail server, etc) ... would that not
>> reduce the overall spam on the 'Net?
>
> Not really, because of two reasons:
>
> 1) Spammers can just register their own domain and set up SPF records
> for that.

An easy way to block spam ... I'd actually *like* that one ... as would most
blacklists out there ...

> 2) Most spam is sent through zombies, so it passes through the SPF
> system undetected.

Please elaborate on this one ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFYQtq4QvfyHIvDvMRAl42AJ92LUeNHjvH8ryD1p2UQjQVBIE8BQCfUdLn
8G0LhuiP5nmn1tXsTI0Robo=
=QTZK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----