Re: Performance large tables.

Benjamin Arai
wrote on Saturday, December 10, 2005 3:37 PM
> ... On the other hand there is a weekly update (This is the
> problem) that updates all of the modified records for a bunch of
> finacial data such as closes and etc.  For the most part they are
> records of the type name,date,value.  The update currently takes almost
> two days.   The update does deletions, insertion, and updates depending
> on what has happened from the previous week.
>
> For the most part the updates are simple one liners.  I currently commit
> in large batch to increase performance but it still takes a while as
> stated above.  From evaluating the computers performance during an
> update,  the system is thrashing both memory and disk.

I experimented with batch size and found that large batches (thousands or
tens of thousands) slowed things down in our situation, while using a
batch size of around 100 or so sped things up tremendously.
Of course, YMMV ...

-Roger