Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
От | Bort, Paul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FE4E@clemail1.tmwsystems.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) ("Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Kenneth Marshall wrote: > > RT is easy to setup/configure/use and works well with PostgreSQL as > > the backend. > > RT works with Postgres, but I wouldn't say well. All queries > in RT are generated by a query generator due to a naive > obsession with database independance. They've achieved > database independance at the cost of all the queries being > brain-dead. Fixing the query generator would be a pretty big job. > We use RT with PostgreSQL for all internal IT requests and development/support/doc tasks on a couple products, and there's never been a problem. Are the queries optimal? no. The alternative might have been MySQL-only, and that would be worse. I can't really give a fair estimate on performance, because I'm running it on a PIII at 800MHz with several other things as well. But it's fast enough that I'm not screaming for a hardware upgrade. Regards, Paul Bort
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: