Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm
От | Bort, Paul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FD5C@clemail1.tmwsystems.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 100 transactions seems barely enough to get through startup > transients. > Maybe 1000 would be good. OK. > > I think the hard part of this is the reporting process. How > do we track how performance varies over time? It doesn't > seem very useful to compare different buildfarm members, but > a longitudinal display of performance on a single buildfarm > machine over time would be cool. > (I'm still missing Mark Wong's daily OSDL performance reports :-() > I was thinking that the output from pgbench would be sent back to the server and stored somewhere for later analysis. > Actually the $64 question here is whether we trust pgbench as > the standard performance test ... I think that it's what we've got today, and if tomorrow it gets better, then the data we get from the buildfarm will improve similarly. Regards, Paul Bort
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: