Re: NFS/NAS
От | James Kelty |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NFS/NAS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DAEBINOFJKIEABJAMLLCAEHNCHAA.jamesk@ashlandagency.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NFS/NAS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hmmmm. Ok well, thanks for the input. Do you know of any decent replication services then so I can use a satalite server farm? -James -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:56 PM To: James Kelty Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] NFS/NAS "James Kelty" <jamesk@ashlandagency.com> writes: > How well does Postgres handle running the DB from a NAS? Postgres doesn't care, although a lot of the oldtimers here will tell you not to use NFS for any data you care about. Check the archives for some horror stories. > For instance, can I > have 10 single cpu systems all running the Postgres daemon with the data > directory on a NetApp or some other device? This will NOT work. One data directory, one postmaster, no more. Multi CPUs in an SMP box is fine, but not independent systems. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: