Re: all backends (pg7.2.3 / redhat 7.2) die due to unexpected signal 14 (SIGALRM)
От | Mark Aufflick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: all backends (pg7.2.3 / redhat 7.2) die due to unexpected signal 14 (SIGALRM) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DAA9078A-327C-11D7-8F93-000393C10932@pumptheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: all backends (pg7.2.3 / redhat 7.2) die due to unexpected signal 14 (SIGALRM) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ahhh, yes, um, (looks to see if anyone noticed) that would be the: use sigtrap qw(die untrapped normal-signals stack-trace any error-signals); line in my code... i will get rid of the 'untrapped normal-signals' and report back. ta. On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Aufflick <mark@pumptheory.com> writes: >> DEBUG: server process (pid 971) was terminated by signal 14 > > Hm, that's SIGALRM on my box, I assume so on yours too. > > AFAICT, there is no part of the Postgres code that runs with SIGALRM > set to default handling: it's either SIG_IGN or the deadlock timer > handler. > >> Both plpgsql and plperlu are used (plperlu is used for one trigger >> function to post a single https form that sends an sms message, and >> record the result body). > > I wonder whether the Perl interpreter is hacking on the SIGALRM > setting. That would be pretty unfriendly of it (but I don't think > Perl quite believes the notion that it might be only a subroutine > library, and not in full control of the process...) > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: