Re: Patch implementing escaped functions timestampadd and
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch implementing escaped functions timestampadd and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DA86056F-C762-434C-825C-585831E5BE5D@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Patch implementing escaped functions timestampadd and timestampdiff ("Xavier Poinsard" <xpoinsard@free.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Xavier The semantics of extract is that it will give the month/hour/minute of the interval, not the number of months/hours/days of the interval Dave On 22-Mar-06, at 11:25 AM, Xavier Poinsard wrote: > Dave Cramer a écrit : >>> You are right, but I would not expect 0 with : >>> >>> select extract(month from >>> (current_date+ interval '3 month'-current_date)); >>> >>> date_part >>> ----------- >>> 0 >>> (1 row) >> >> >> This is still an interval basically you have >> >> date + interval - date which will be an interval. date - date is an >> interval > > I think the interval implementation is bit deficient, since it only > keeps one unit. Instead of keeping only the difference in days, it > could > have keep the information in month too. > > test=> select (current_date+interval '3 month'-current_date); > ?column? > ---------- > 92 days > (1 row) > > test=> select extract(month from (interval '3 month')); > date_part > ----------- > 3 > (1 row) > > select extract(month from (interval '1 year')); > date_part > ----------- > 0 > (1 row) >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: