Re: Bricolage: Impressive
От | David Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
Дата | |
Msg-id | DA7A5E11-4AAC-11D8-8158-000A95972D84@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bricolage: Impressive ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Jan 18, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > David, could you comment to Robert's questions below? > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Robert Treat wrote: > >> stumbling block for techdocs. One thing that we do need is the >> ablility >> for users comments on articles, is there any provision for that? >> Another thing that could come up would be user articles submitted in >> pdf >> form (I just added one yesterday), is there a provision for that? No. Bricolage is entirely a back=end application. For users to comment on articles, you'd have to do one of two things: Either implement something for it on the front-end server (I'm sure there are plenty of simple OSS solutions for this), or create some sort of gateway script that takes a submitted comment and submits it to the Bricolage SOAP server to be added to a document, and then triggering the republish of that document. For performance reasons, I recommend the former. HTH, David
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: