Re: LargeObjectDrop and simple_heap_delete - Are these errors normal?
От | tech techie |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LargeObjectDrop and simple_heap_delete - Are these errors normal? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D9ACAF7797E9B6D4DB65C40525B2BE7C@techie.1stcounsel.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | LargeObjectDrop and simple_heap_delete - Are these errors normal? ("tech techie" <techie@1stcounsel.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LargeObjectDrop and simple_heap_delete - Are these errors normal?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
More information: I'm running PostgreSQL version 7.3.2 on linux RH 8.0 (Linux version 2.4.18-14smp (bhcompile@stripples.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) After the most recent 'crash' I went into single user mode, and did the following: 1) reindex database dbname --> 5 minutes to run 2) vacuum full ----> 45 minutes with the following errors: backend> vacuum full; WARNING: Index pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (1191) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1302). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_attribute_relid_attnum_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (1191) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1302). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_class_oid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (144) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (180). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_class_relname_nsp_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (144) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (180). Recreate the index. WARNING: Rel pg_largeobject: Uninitialized page 399948 - fixing WARNING: Index pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (227408) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1147110). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_attrdef_adrelid_adnum_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (145) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (147). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_attrdef_oid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (145) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (147). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_statistic_relid_att_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (19) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (324). Recreate the index. WARNING: Index pg_toast_16408_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (3). Recreate the index. 3) I then recreated the offending indexes like the backend asked me to (except the backend complained on the last one, where the number of tuples was zero, claiming that the index did not exist). 4) reindex database dbname --> 45 seconds to run stoped the backend, and let my customers back in. The LargeObjectDrop errors are still there, and If I have a corrupted database I'ld love to do WHATEVER it takes to fix it and ensure it doesn't happen again. What did I do wrong? THANKS AGAIN in advance, techie@1stcounsel.com Sent by 1stcounsel.com Mail Premium Accounts for Legal Professionals http://1stcounsel.com/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: