Re: Backups
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2079CF0BF@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Backups (Richard Harley <richard@scholarpack.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backups
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Richard Harley wrote: > Very simple question - does pg_dump/dumpall hit the server in terms of database performance? We > currently do nightly backups and I want to move to hourly backups but not at the expense of hogging > all the resources for 5 mins. > > Pg_dumpall is currently producing a 1GB file - that's the combined size of around 30 databases and it > takes around 5 mins to run. pg_dump will be a performance hit, because it consumes disk I/O capacity. You could measure how the system is affected by your current backup. On the other hand, instead of doing an hourly pg_dump, it might be preferable to do a filesystem backup and PITR. That way you have to do a backup only once a day (or week, depends how much traffic you have and how fast you have to restore) and can still recover to an arbitrary point in time. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: