Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C207950642@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > Well, I guess I'm still of the opinion that the real question is > whether the particular lint checks that Pavel's implemented are good > and useful things. Has anyone spent any time looking at *that*? Actually, I did when I reviewed the patch the first time round. I think that the checks implemented are clearly good and useful, since any problem reported will lead to an error at runtime if a certain code path in the function is taken. And if the code path is never taken, that's valuable information too. I don't say that there are no good checks missing, but the ones that are there are good IMO. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: