Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2073488E5@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote: >> The syntax error messages are still inadequate; all I can get is >> 'syntax error at or near "%s"'. They should be more detailed. > > this system is based on error messages that generates a plpgsql engine > or bison engine. I can correct only a few percent from these messages > :( > > internally I didn't wrote a compiler or plpgsql checker - this is just > tool that can emit some plpgsql interpret subprocess - and when these > subprocesses raises exceptions, then takes their messages. I see. >> I think that at least the documentation should be improved before >> I am ready to set this as "ready for committer". > > please, can you send a correction to documentation or error messages? > > I am not able to write documentation I'll give it a try. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: