Re: question about readonly instances
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: question about readonly instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C20670CD1C@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: question about readonly instances (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Szymon Guz wrote: >>> I've got a question about quite a strange configuration. >>> I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one postgresql >>> instance writes data, and many other instances read those. >>> Is that possible without any replication and copying data? >> >> Why do they think they need that? > > They've got some quite > nice and huge storage and it would be nice to use it from many different machines running postgreses. I'm surprised to hear that. Normally storage is the bottleneck for a database, i.e. you would not gain performance if more than one database ran against the same storage. > Another option is Oracle which can do that. I have not heard that RAC is a performance booster. It's more like a protection against certain types of hardware failure. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: