Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2049FCE7B@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote: >> My attempt at a syntax that could also cover Peter's wish for multiple >> checker functions: >> >> CHECK FUNCTION { func(args) | ALL [IN SCHEMA schema] [FOR ROLE user] } >> [ USING check_function ] OPTIONS (optname optarg [, ...]) > check_function should be related to one language, so you have to > specify language if you would to specify check_function (if we would > to have more check functions for one language). Right, I forgot LANGUAGE: CHECK FUNCTION { func(args) | ALL IN LANGUAGE pl [IN SCHEMA schema] [FOR ROLE user] }[ USING check_function ] OPTIONS (optnameoptarg [, ...]) If func(args) is given, the language can be inferred. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: