Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> acording to kernel folks, anticipatory scheduler is even better for dbs.
> Oh well, it probably means everyone has to test it on their own at the
> end of day.
In my test case, noop and deadline performed well, deadline being a little
better than noop.
Both anticipatory and CFQ sucked big time.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe