Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CD794@voyager.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL and memory usage ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:30 PM > To: Dann Corbit > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and memory usage > > > "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> writes: > > I have a machine with 4 CPU's and 2 gigabytes of physical > ram. I would > > like to get PostgreSQL to use as much memory as possible. I can't > > seem to get PostgreSQL to use more than 100 megabytes or so. > > You should not assume that more is necessarily better. > > In many practical situations, it's better to leave the > majority of RAM free for kernel disk caching. In any case, I would like to know what knobs and dials are available to turn and what each of them means. In at least one instance, the whole database should fit into memory. I would think that would be faster than any sort of kernel disk caching.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: