Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B829408C1A@voyager.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SCSI vs. IDE performance test (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen [mailto:jleelim@xxxxxx.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:02 AM > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SCSI vs. IDE performance test > > > The SCSI improvement over IDE seems overrated in the test. I > would have expected at most a 30% improvement. Other reviews > seem to point out that IDE performs just as well or better. > > See Tom's hardware: > http://www20.tomshardware.com/storage/20020305> /index.html > My own tests show that 15K RPM ultra 320 SCSI drives are considerably faster than any IDE storage. This ATA drive: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/WD360GD.asp Performs as well or better than many SCSI drives, and are not terribly expensive. Therefore, these are a very good choice if price performance is more important than absolute performance. But if you need absolute horsepower, then one of these (or other 15K Ultra320 equivalent) won't be beaten: http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200304/200304068C073x0_1.html
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: