Re: geo_decls.h oopsie...
От | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: geo_decls.h oopsie... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8290FD4EC@voyager.corporate.connx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | geo_decls.h oopsie... ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart@fourpalms.org] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:22 PM To: Dann Corbit Cc: Tom Lane; Hackers List Subject: Re: geo_decls.h oopsie... > > But to compare floating point, those are simply wrong. > See previous discussions concerning the quality of the builtin geometric > types. Not clear that it's worth worrying about, unless you want to go > in for a wholesale overhaul. My own opinion is that PostGIS will > supersede the need for these types... Oops. I think that we will welcome any updates and fixes to any of the built in features of PostgreSQL, no matter our individual opinions of the usefulness of a particular feature (right??). In this case, the return value patches would seem to be important and the second topic should be addressed also. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Also, the PostGIS is under a far more restrictive license (E.g. I cannot/won't use it.) If fixing a bug is easy, why not fix it? For most tests, there won't be any difference anyway. It is only when the numbers become large or small that differences start to appear. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: