Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D8B5F558-983C-4831-AA41-CD063B0CA341@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, it does, and yes they should be. The real solution appears to be to use the current server timezone, not the other way around. See my other posts. Dave On 20-Jul-05, at 1:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes: > >> ... Problems arise when the server and JDK don't have the >> same set of timezones, which will happen, but not often. We could >> easily >> add a URL parameter to bail people out of here though. >> > > Hmm ... does Java have a standard set of timezone names? If so, > does it > bear any resemblance to the zic database names? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: