Re: Where did the Developer docs go?
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Where did the Developer docs go? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D8A18118-40CE-484E-B28F-35C67F3CD69D@excoventures.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Where did the Developer docs go? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Where did the Developer docs go?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 20:53, Jonathan S. Katz > <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote: >> One thing raised on IRC: >> >> Going >> to http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-createtable.html will >> actually redirect just to the index, >> i.e. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ >> >> If all the URLs map 1-1 should we setup a rewrite rule? > > It can be done. It was not done for two reasons: > 1) then people will never update their bookmarks ;) Unfortunately neither will Google or the other search engines, or blog posts linking to a feature in the development docs.(i.e. search "site:http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs" to see indexed pages) - from the user experience side thatwould be a bit frustrating. Granted it's not like it's the stable docs where we do need that permanence, but I do think it's wise to make it easy fornew users to find information, even if it means a few people do not update their bookmarks. > 2) i'm not entirely sure everything is 1-1. In particular, I think > there may well be files left over from old versions of postgres in the > old one that people still link to. I guess they'd still just get a 404 > in a different place (on the new site), so reason two holds much less > weight than the first one. But since it is old and not up-to-date with the developer docs, then they should update their bookmarks. Or stop linkingto an old feature ;-) Jonathan
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: