Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015364@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 09 June 2002 20:46 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include > implicit schemas > > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > Attached is the result which seems to work OK here. The existing > > current_schemas() works as previously, & I have added > > current_schemas(bool) which will return the full implicit/explicit > > path if passed true or the explicit path is pass false. > > This patch will break the existing current_schemas() function > AFAICS; the code will be testing a value that it wasn't > passed, and getting a random result, so it's unclear which > behavior you'd get. Ahh, I was unaware of that - too used to VB & C# where booleans default to false I suppose... > Since current_schemas() isn't in any released code yet, it's > not by any means set in stone. I'd be willing to simply > change it to take a boolean parameter always. Comments anyone? Fine with me. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: