Re: More schema queries
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More schema queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF6101529C@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: More schema queries
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 20 May 2002 15:16 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: More schema queries > > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > gcc -g -o postgres.exe -Wl,--base-file,postgres.base postgres.exp > > access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o > > commands/SUBSYS.o executor /SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o > > main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o > > postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o > storage/ SUBSYS.o > > tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o -lcygipc -lcrypt > > access/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x13):heaptuple.c: undefined reference to > > `mcount' > > On Unix it's necessary for the link step to include a -pg > switch, just like the compile steps. This is evidently not > happening in the Windows case. > > In the Unix case, $(PROFILE) gets incorporated into > $(LDFLAGS) in src/Makefile.global, and then > src/backend/Makefile uses $(LDFLAGS) in the backend link rule > (line 40 in current source). I don't see any inclusion of > flags at all in the Windows link rule at lines 48, 50. > Presumably these ought to at least mention $(PROFILE), and I > wonder whether they should not say $(LDFLAGS). > > Please check it out and submit a patch... Attached (& CC'd to -patches). It all built OK with this, so I'll go off and play with initdb & gprof now. Regards, Dave.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: