Re: More schema queries
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More schema queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF6101509B@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | More schema queries ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: More schema queries
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 21 May 2002 20:09 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More schema queries > > > I guess your version of getopt() won't cooperate with -- > switches. I've committed this change in CVS. Thanks. > > I'm still interested in why explicitly saying "create view > pg_catalog.foo" didn't work ... I've just been playing with this as you suggested, and using an initdb with both 'create view foo' and 'create view pg_catalog.bar', with the -- style switch I get (for both types of view): namespace_search_path = $user,public newRelation->schemaname = null namespaceId = 2200 (public) So I guess the problem is a combination of the getopt() that we've already found, and schemaname being null in the newRelation structure. Using the -c style switch in PGSQL_OPTS gives namespace_search_path = pg_catalog as expected. I am interested in learning more about this so any pointers you might offer would be useful (I seriously doubt I'd find the fault myself though) but I do understand that you probably have better things to do than help me begin to understand the internals so I won't be overly offended if you don't have time :-) Cheers, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: